by Miriam Ramirez de Ferrer, MD 
      President, Puerto Ricans in Civic Action
      Make no mistake about it, the prospect
      of federal taxation for Puerto Rico's elite, not the voter's
      preference for the status quo tipped the scales against an outright
      statehood triumph on December 13th. Paying little or no taxes
      under the porous Hacienda collection apparatus, the wealthy five
      percent among us feared the efficiency of the Internal Revenue
      Service more than they fancied commonwealth. 
      For having artfully raised the
      specter of federal taxation as the curse of statehood, commonwealth
      advocates have rubbed the noses of American taxpayers in the
      more than $10 billion yearly Puerto Rican subsidy, inviting re-evaluation
      of the "something for nothing" philosophy that has
      served as the PDP's underpinning over these past 45 plus years. 
      Washington will take away our "free
      lunch" as Young and his congressional colleagues investigate
      the implications and causes of the 'None of the Above' results.
      Spurred on by their stateside constituents legislation will almost
      certainly be introduced and passed to make us carry our own weight
      fiscally. 
      Once having achieved the dubious
      distinction of first class US citizenship tax-wise -- thanks
      to the PDP, full and equal American citizenship as residents
      of the fifty-first state will almost certainly soon follow thereafter
      as sure as night follows day.
      | 
  
  
    
      
        
          
            
            The Vote Leaves Puerto Rico Without a Voter-Mandated
            Course
            The recent referendum in Puerto Rico was supposed to set the
            course for the island's political future. Instead, the vote left
            the outlook for the Caribbean island as cloudy as a stormy sky. 
            [T]he ballot was so crowded with options and the various parties
            ran such negative campaigns, it should not be surprising that
            disgusted citizens lodged a protest vote in a contest they recognized
            would be meaningless. 
            Congress should approve another referendum , this one binding
            and including only viable options. "None of the above"
            does nothing to resolve the island's future. -The Tampa Tribune,
            Editorial
            | 
         
       
      
      Washington -- Nothing in the current US-Puerto
      Rico relationship would prevent Congress from levying federal
      taxes in Puerto Rico under commonwealth, the Congressional Research
      Service's constitutional expert said. 
      "Congress has full powers to tax the
      US territories and there is nothing special under commonwealth
      relationship to stop it," said John Killian, who often writes
      opinions for Congress on Puerto Rico. "Taxation without
      representation is just a slogan. There is nothing in the Constitution
      about it," Killian said. 
      [A] "trend" may be building here
      to get Puerto Rico to contribute to the federal treasury... [as]
      federal officials here ask why the island is receiving some $10
      billion yearly in federal funds without contributing to the federal
      treasury. -Robert Friedman, The San Juan Star 
      
      After four centuries of colonialism under
      Spain, and a century and three days after the signing of the
      Treaty of Paris of Dec. 10, 1898, we expected a decision in favor
      of decolonization. 
      Each of the options on the plebiscite ballot
      was to confer dignity, liberty and pride on all Puerto Ricans.
      But each of the three status formulas implied the assumption
      of certain duties and responsibilities. 
      Unfortunately, 50% of the voters decided
      not to decide. Puerto Rico decided not to decide. The decision
      is now up to Washington. -Neftali Fuster 
      The
      Current Commonwealth Status Cannot Be Maintained
      "Ultimately,
      Puerto Ricans will be faced with two choices: independent status
      or statehood." -Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN)
      Statehood Issue Not Dead, Puerto Rico Has to
      Change
      "The days
      of the virtual one-way flow of U.S. federal dollars flowing into
      Puerto Rico as a commonwealth are ending", Rep. Don Young
      (R-AK)
      Federal
      Taxation Could Be Imposed On Commonwealth Under Legislation Introduced
      In Congress. Fiscal Equity and Responsibility for Puerto Rico,
      H.R. 4769
     | 
    
      Confusion
      Over the Puerto Rican Vote
       The only clear message from the recent
      plebiscite in Puerto Rico is that the question of the island's
      political future remains deeply divisive. Congress's failure
      to sponsor orderly balloting that would give the island's 3.8
      million voters a meaningful say about their political status
      has not helped. 
 
      Congress can reduce the confusion by crafting a referendum with
      input from Puerto Rican leaders on all sides that accurately
      reflects the options available. "None of the above"
      does not move Puerto Ricans any closer to defining their future.
      -New York Times, Editorial 
      
      Congress must select and fairly define
      the Puerto Rican status choices it would be prepared to accept.
      These would include a version of commonwealth that enabled Puerto
      Rico to be governed in a fully democratic manner, statehood,
      and nationhood of one sort or another -- independence or "free
      association." It would then be up to Puerto Ricans to make
      an informed and realistic decision among them. The decision and
      the resulting transition may take years. But nothing less will
      satisfy the obligation to convert an imperial property into a
      place of dignity for American citizens who are equal in rights
      to all others. -Washington Post, Editorial 
      UNDERSTANDING
      THE PUERTO RICO STATUS VOTE
      Voter rejection of the present territorial
      commonwealth status, rejection of independence in any form, combined
      with voter reluctance to make a choice among known options, reflects
      a need for federal territorial policy reform which Congress can
      no longer ignore. For only Congress has the authority and responsibility
      under the U.S. Constitution to define the terms for resolution
      of Puerto Rico's status. 
      The historical vote favoring statehood
      over all available options sets the stage for further integration
      of Puerto Rico into the political, economic and fiscal system
      of the nation. Ultimately, Congress must exercise its exclusive
      power to define terms for Puerto Rico to remain under U.S. sovereignty
      or achieve separate sovereignty. Only then can the U.S. citizens
      in Puerto Rico make an informed choice in a Congressionally sponsored
      self-determination process to resolve the status of the territory
      permanently. -Citizens Educational Foundation 
      
      "I am confident that once Congress
      has assumed its responsibilities under the Constitution's Territorial
      Clause and defined the real status options available to the people
      of Puerto Rico, they will choose statehood. 
      "Born in 1904, a citizen of the US
      by law in1917, I look forward to celebrating my own centennial
      under a fifty-one star flag." -Luis A. Ferré 
        
      
      
     |